ABOUT THE JOURNAL OF GEOECONOMICS

The Journal of Geoeconomics serves as a premier platform for rigourous academic research and scholarly inquiry, informed policy analysis, insightful commentary and practical engagement on the multifaceted dynamics of geoeconomic competition and cooperation in the contemporary world. By embracing interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary perspectives, the journal aims to advance knowledge, foster dialogue, and inform decision-making on critical issues at the nexus of economics, geopolitics, international affairs, statecraft and trade. The journal embraces both quantitative and qualitative research methods, and multiple levels of analyses at the macro, industry, firm or individual/group level.

• Scholars and Researchers: Academics and researchers from diverse disciplines, including economics, international relations, strategic studies, political science, business, history and related fields, interested in advancing theoretical knowledge and empirical understanding of geoeconomics.

• Applied Practitioners: Policymakers, diplomats, strategists, and analysts working in government agencies, international organizations, think tanks, and the private sector, involved in economic policy-making, strategic planning, and geopolitical analysis.

• Policymakers: Decision-makers at national and international levels seeking evidence-based analysis, innovative ideas, and practical recommendations to navigate complex geoeconomic challenges and shape effective policies.

Editorial Board Members

Balkan Devlen, Carleton University (Canada)

John F. Jungclaussen, University of Oxford (UK)
Christian Leuprecht, Royal Military College of Canada & Queen's University (Canada)

D. Matthew Millar, The Millar Group (UK)

Associate Editors

Nick Cohen, Columbia University (USA)

Isabelle McRae, The London School of Economics and Political Science (UK)
Lucie Škopková, Charles University (Czechia)

The Journal of Geoeconomics welcomes submissions from a variety of disciplines, including international relations, strategic studies, political science, economics, business and insurance, innovation, international finance, political economy and economic geography. Interdisciplinary work is especially welcomed. The journal embraces both quantitative and qualitative research methods, and multiple levels of analyses at the macro, industry, firm or individual/group level.

It publishes academically rigorous and impactful contributions to evidence-based policy analysis and policymaking, including lessons learned from experiences in different societies and economies, in both developed- and  developing-country contexts. It welcomes contributions from the academic community, private sector, policymakers, research institutes, international organizations and others.

 The journal publishes:

• Research: Original empirical research articles examining various aspects of geoeconomics, including case studies, comparative analyses, and conceptual frameworks. 

• Reviews: Comprehensive reviews and synthesis of existing literature, debates, and emerging trends in geoeconomics.

• Policy Briefs: Concise assessments of relevant policy issues and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, drawing on rigorous analysis and evidence-based insights.

• Commentary: Thought-provoking perspectives, opinions, and analyses on current events, emerging challenges, and future trends in geoeconomics, providing critical insights and stimulating debate.   

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Most authors can choose between CC BY, CC BY-NC, and CC BY-NC-ND Creative Commons Licenses, though certain funders mandate a particular type of CC license is used. 

The Journal of Geoeconomics maintains the highest standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process. All research articles published undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

• All research articles are reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts.
• All publication decisions are made by the Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided.
• Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions.
• Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows the Journal of Geoeconomics to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers and editors.

The Journal of Geoeconomics employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of academic and policy-oriented scholarship. Typically, manuscripts are reviewed by two independent academic experts, with additional input from policy community experts as needed. This approach guarantees that publications are not only academically robust but also highly relevant to contemporary policy debates. Reviewers are required to adhere to the journal's Ethics Policy, including observing COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines. Reviewers and editorial staff are expected to remain vigilant for any signs of misconduct and report concerns to the editorial office immediately.

Manuscripts are evaluated against the following criteria:

1. Relevance to the Journal's Aims and Scope: The paper must align with the journal's focus on the intersection of economics, policy, and global strategic affairs.
2. Academic Standards: Manuscripts should demonstrate originality, significance, and methodological rigor, in accordance with widely accepted academic practices and the journal's own high standards for research and analysis.
3. Policy Impact: The research should offer substantial contributions to policy discussions and evidence-based decision-making in geoeconomics.

1. Initial Screening: The Managing Editor conducts a preliminary check to ensure manuscripts comply with the journal’s submission guidelines. Papers may be returned to authors for adjustments before advancing to the Editors' desk.
2. Editorial Assessment: The Editors-in-Chief and/or Deputy Editors evaluate submissions for their alignment with the journal’s scope, publishing standards, and relevance to the policy community. They decide whether the manuscript should move forward in the review process.
3. Assignment to Associate Editor: Papers that pass the initial editorial assessment are assigned to an Associate Editor with expertise in the relevant subject area. The Associate Editor decides if the manuscript should proceed to peer review and selects suitable reviewers.
4. Peer Review: The manuscript is typically reviewed by two subject-matter experts. The selection of reviewers considers both the research methods and geographical focus of the paper. Additional reviews or policy insights may be solicited from experts within the policy community.
5. Decision Recommendation: Based on reviewer feedback, the Associate Editor will make a recommendation to the Editors regarding the manuscript's publication status.
6. Final Decision: The ultimate decision rests with the Editors.

• Conflict of Interest: Editors are excluded from decisions on manuscripts where they are authors or contributors. In such cases, an alternate Editor oversees the review and publication decision.
• Guest Editors: Guest Editors involved in Special Issues or Focused Sections are excluded from the review process for manuscripts to which they have contributed. The Editors of the journal will manage these cases.
• Geoeconomics Insights: The review process for articles submitted to the Geoeconomics Insights section follows the same rigorous standards as externally submitted papers, with adjustments to reflect the specific nature of this section. These articles are reviewed by relevant experts from international organizations, academia, and the policy community.

Authors will receive detailed and constructive feedback at each stage of the review process. This ensures transparency and supports the improvement of manuscripts.

Associate Editors and reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, institutions, or companies involved in the manuscript. In such cases, they must inform the Editors and recuse themselves from the review process.

Manuscripts under review are confidential documents. All participants in the review process must maintain strict confidentiality.

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a formal letter with evidence supporting their case. Appeals are considered only in cases of:

1. Technical Errors: Possible errors in the reviewers' evaluation.
2. New Information: New data or information that has emerged since the manuscript's submission.
3. Conflict of Interest: Evidence of potential conflicts of interest among reviewers.

Appeals must be submitted within 14 days of receiving the decision. Each manuscript is allowed one appeal, which will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief, with input from the editorial team and, if necessary, the Editorial Advisory Board. The decision of the Editor-in-Chief is final.

Appeal letters should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief and submitted to the editorial office.